Re: GDB 5.0 2000-03-05

["H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Wed, Mar 08, 2000 at 01:49:10AM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>    Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 16:12:42 -0800
>    From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> 
>    This patch disable the thread_db interface by default. gdb works MUCH
>    better now with threaded programs, including the testcase above. May
>    I suggest for 5.0, we disable thread_db and fix whatever bugs we can
>    fix in linux-thread.c? I will take a closer look at linux-thread.c
>    when I find time.
> 
>    Thanks.
> 
> I like this approach.  Then we can simply enable thread_db when we've
> fixed all critical bugs.
> 
> But the patch looks wrong to me.  Seems to *enable* thread_db by
> default, end what's up with LIN_CTHREAD_CFLAGS?

I don't think so. My patch disables thread_db by default. I have
verified it.


H.J.