This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".

To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:50:46 -0700
References: <3A54D5D2.CCA3E45E@redhat.com> <3A59DE42.5295C9A5@cygnus.com> <3A6318BF.A9A43A10@redhat.com> <20010115113635.B26739@redhat.com>

On Jan 15, 11:36am, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 10:35:27AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> >If there is a maintainer for this code please speak up.
> >
> >Otherwise I will check this in under the "obvious fix" rule.
> 
> Do we really have an "obvious fix" rule?  It seems that there is
> some confusion on this issue.

We do not have an "obvious fix" rule.  See

    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2000-04/msg00468.html

Kevin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".
  - From: Fernando Nasser

References:
- RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".
  - From: Fernando Nasser
- Re: RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".
  - From: Fernando Nasser
- Re: RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".
  - From: Fernando Nasser
- Re: RFA: [infrun.c] Fix to "nexti".
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]