Re: [patch] fix for infinite recursion in lookup_symbol

[Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 04:09:27PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
>I would like to see this in. There are too many divergences already.
>
>Fernando, JimI can one of you commit this?
>
>Unless there is some opposition from JimB. (if he replies within say,
>5 hours :-).

Can I just suggest that we check it in now and let JimB yell if he
disapproves?  I think enough experienced eyes have looked at this for
there to be a very small chance that the patch is wrong.

What does everyone think about setting a "vote system" for this kind
of contingency?  We could say that the vote of four gdb engineers with
write-after-approval == one maintainer with the maintainer having
absolute authority to remove patches that they think are incorrect,
of course.

cgf