This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa] Change line to long
- To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [rfa] Change line to long
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:33:43 -0800
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <200102012036.MAA01098@bosch.cygnus.com> <1010201232140.ZM24474@ocotillo.lan>
Kevin Buettner wrote:
> I'll leave it up to Andrew to decide what to do about it. If gdb had
> something like uint32_t available, I'd suggest using that.
Not my problem, it it's up to symtab the symtab maintainers to decide.
As for C9x types, nah, lets use a hybrid SID/GCC's type system - UI, SI,
NFI, ... (I'm being sarcastic ok :-). More seriously, the types
LONGEST, ULONGEST and CORE_ADDR are doing pretty well for the moment.
Code that cares about preserving type info should really be using
``struct value'' or ``struct type''.
Andrew