This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <chastain at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Assuming malloc exists in callfwmall.exp
- From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:41:27 -0500
- CC: ac131313 at cygnus dot com, fnasser at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, keiths at cygnus dot com
- Organization: Red Hat , Inc. - Toronto
- References: <200102152008.MAA27020@bosch.cygnus.com>
Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> > And if he/she is a really good maintainer he/she will reject your patch
> > as it would be adding a restriction to inferior function calls that we
> > do not currently have.
>
> How do you know whether calling an inferior function uses malloc or not?
>
If it does not call a string it does not.
> You know because callfwmall.exp tests it.
>
???
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat - Toronto E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9