This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] More completion improvements
- To: fnasser at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] More completion improvements
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at delorie dot com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:58:25 -0500 (EST)
- CC: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010218092227.4804N-100000@is> <3A8FE260.217C0FB1@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:55:28 -0500
> From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
>
> In the general case, it is always nice to see if the maintainer of the
> file has some objection though, as he/she may have a better idea of how
> something should be used or some other detail that requires a "field
> expert" opinion.
> This does not apply to your patch though. You are just giving extra
> information to the CLI so it can do a smarter completion.
Okay, thanks for clarifying this. I think I'll wait for a day or two,
to let others chance to send comments, just to be on the safe side.
> The exception would be the extra help lines you've added.
Ahm... what extra help lines? I don't think I added anything, I just
changed indentation a bit where it was required by calling a different
function (e.g., add_set_enum_cmd instead of add_set_cmd), which moves
the left parenthesis a bit, and thus changes indentation of the
following lines.
> I am a completion addict
That makes two of us. I'm so addicted to completion I cannot use any
interface that lacks it without being disgusted.