This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA]: Remote protocol symbol lookup service.
Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
> > Michael Snyder wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Andrew,
> >>
> >> I've changed the initial message from "Q" to "q" as you suggested, and
> >> I've hexified the filenames and symbol names, so that they are not
> >> vulnerable to embedded special characters. If you have a name for the
> >> initial message that you would prefer over "qSharedObject", I'm open
> >> to suggestions.
>
> The best I can think of is ``qSymbol:'' - an initial empty symbol to get
> things started.
Ok.
> As with the other packets, it will need the ``set remote XXXX-packet
> enable/disable'' command and logic to detect when it was simply ignored.
> If it was ignored ("" vs "OK"), it shouldn't be retried.
Ok.
> Could I also suggest moving the code doing the work in:
>
> > + /* Function to be called whenever a new objfile (shlib) is detected. */
> > + static void
> > + remote_new_objfile (struct objfile *objfile)
>
> to a separate function and adding a call to it from remote_open_*(). As
> far as I know, that will cover all cases
Ok.
> Don't forget the doco.
Ok.