This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Remove OS-specific defines (was: _WIN32?)
- To: fnasser at redhat dot com
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Remove OS-specific defines (was: _WIN32?)
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 09:36:35 +0300 (IDT)
- CC: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <20010503211502.21716.qmail@web6401.mail.yahoo.com> <3AF1DAA0.3060702@cygnus.com> <200105071610.TAA24144@is.elta.co.il> <200105130831.LAA13751@is.elta.co.il> <3AFE9504.6C8819C9@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> Date: Sun, 13 May 2001 10:07:00 -0400
> From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
>
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 19:10:59 +0300 (IDT)
> > > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
> > >
> > > I'm seeking approval for the following patches. They remove all the
> > > DOS- and Windows-specific #ifdef's like "#ifdef _WIN32" and use the
> > > portable macros from filenames.h instead. In addition, they convert
> > > code which used macros private to GDB, such as SLASH_P and ROOTED_P,
> > > to use the macros from filenames.h instead.
> >
> > Ping!
> >
> > I think I still need an approval for patches to source.c, completer.c
> > and cli-cmds.c (see below). Did I missed some messages?
> >
>
> I looked at completer.c and cli-cmds.c. Approved.
Thanks!
Who is the responsible maintainer of source.c? I cannot figure that
out from MAINTAINERS.