This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: PATCH: partial merge of dwarf2.h
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
> > Per Bothner writes:
> > > Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Shouldn't the copyright years include 2001 as well?
> > >
> > > Well, the gcc/dwarf2.h doesn't, and this is basically a merge
> > > from that. (There are some formatting differences, and there
> > > are also some extensions in the binutils version. I'm leaving those
> > > as is for now.)
> >
> > Ok, you haven't changed anything. But still, the file itself has been
> > touched. Hmm, I don't know what the rules are in this case.
>
> The rules are that the Copyright notice should mention years when
> someone worked on a released version of a file. So if the changes
> were done by GCC maintainers only in 2000, I think it is okay not to
> include 2001.
>
Thanks for clarifying this, Eli.
I withdraw my objection.
Elena