Re: [PATCH/RFC] Improve the "thread_step_needed" logic

[Daniel Jacobowitz <dmj+ at andrew dot cmu dot edu>]

On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 09:11:37AM -0700, Michael Snyder wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > My apologies.  I need to read closer before replying :)
> > 
> > I'm assuming that singlestep_breakpoints_inserted_p is zero normally
> > upon entering resume - that only makes sense.  In that case, your
> > change preserves the exact behavior I was asking for.  I'm going to run
> > it through the testsuite on MIPS/Linux, which I've finally gotten into
> > (almost) functional shape, and let you know if something breaks - I
> > expect that it will not break, though.
> 
> Since I do not have a Mips Linux system, I will be
> very interested in your results.

Nothing blew up - in fact, between that and another patch I have my
closest to a successful test run yet.  Not great, but:

                === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes            6603
# of unexpected failures        141
# of unexpected successes       32
# of expected failures          161
# of unresolved testcases       26
# of untested testcases         24

Thanks for your help!

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Monta Vista Software                              Debian Security Team