This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: shared libraries and a remote target



Elena Zannoni wrote:

> Stephen Smith writes:
>  > I am re-submitting the patch contained in this email.  The the last of the discussion  is at
>  >      http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-03/msg00234.html
>  >
>  > and the original patch submittal is at
>  >
>  >     http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2001-04/msg00185.html
>  >
>  > The patches still apply cleanly to the development tree - I tried this morning.
>  >
>  > Thanks
>  > sps
>  >
>
> Hi Stephen, thanks for your submission.
>
> Did you get a copyright assignment? One of your earlier
> messages indicated that you were having troubles getting one.
>

It is all done!  I even have the document back from the FSF!

>
> A few comments (sorry to be picky, but these are the rules).  Your
> patch doesn't fully follow the gnu coding standards.  Comments
> shouldn't be in c++ style. Variable names should not be using mixed
> upper and lower case, use '_' to separate words instead.  I see a few
> missing white spaces before '('.  Don't use 'extern' in .c files: does
> remote.c already include top.h?
>
> Instead of using add_symbol_file_command, you should use
> symbol_file_add, which is already exported (this would take
> symfile.[ch] out of the picture). See its usage in other gdb files.
> I believe this would be ok for your purposes.
>

Thanks for the comments.  I will work on that.

>
> I am not clear on why we need the option to be set at gdb startup.
> Could it be done with a set command by the user, after gdb has started?
> This would avoid the need for initializationBlock, I think.
>

I initialized the variable so that it had a known value when gdb starts up.  I
had proposed that in the original proposal.


>
> I cannot really comment on the remote protocol side of things, that's
> Andrew's baby. Or on shared libraries, that would be Kevin's.
>

I will wait <grin>

>
> The configure.tgt patch should be submitted separately, because it is
> not logically related to the shared library issue.
>

Will do!

>
> Thanks
> Elena
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]