This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: What is on the 5.1 branch; Was: [rfc] Re: read_register_bytes() bug; was my Regcache revamp

On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 09:09:41AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 01:42:51 -0400
> > From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> > 
> > As far as I know most of the patches going past at the moment are not 
> > going onto the branch(1).  Hmm, quick check, I've attached a copy of the 
> > 5.1 ChangeLog.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Why aren't the entries there in chronological order?

I tend to date ChangeLog entries with the day the patch was last
modified, not the day it was committed.  Do others prefer to keep the
changelog dates relative to the day the source changed?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]