This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method

To: Jason Molenda <jason-swarelist at molenda dot com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 10:32:43 -0400
Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <C854422C-AA18-11D5-94ED-0030657B5340@cgsoftware.com> <7370175E-AA1B-11D5-94ED-0030657B5340@cgsoftware.com> <20010915140234.A17079@shell17.ba.best.com> <200109160715.JAA07114@is.elta.co.il> <3BA6E214.9020700@cygnus.com> <20010917231109.A25642@shell17.ba.best.com>

>> The suggested criteria for committing something to the 5.1 branch are:
>> 
>> o	does it build (and if not did it build in 5.0/4.18)
>> 
>> o	does ``break main; run'' work
> 
> 
> If the bar is that high for patches on the release branch, then
> this change does not meet it.  We'll still need to address this on
> the trunk.

There is no bar, it is a suggestion :-) See:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2001-07/msg00418.html

Andrew

References:
- Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
  - From: Jason Molenda
- Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [RFA] bug in symtab.c:lookup_block_symbol()'s search method
  - From: Jason Molenda

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]