Re: [PATCH]: testsuite/gdb.base/ending-run.*

[Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>]

Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:28:19AM -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch.
> >
> > It is approved with a small change (see below).  It is OK fr the tests
> > to expect alternative patterns depending on the target, but the
> > test identification must remain the same nevertheless (it would
> > confuse people's test result analysis scripts otherwise).
> > The reference that matches the pattern to the architecture must
> > be on the comment (only).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Fernando
> >
> > P.S.: It is OK to still say "ARM thumb" as ARM is the reference
> > architecture
> > that is licensed by chip manufacturers (it is still ARM at the core).
> 
> I'm sorry about that.  It's not an ARM in thumb mode.  I just
> copied the text from the case below and didn't remove the "thumb"
> text.  It should be
> 
>         pass "step out of main on Stormy16"
> 
> Still ok?
> 

No, all the "pass" statements (as well as the "fail", "xfail" etc.) must
have the same test id string.  In this case, all the "-re" patterns 
must result in a "pass" or "fail" with that same string (except that the
"fail" may have a reason between parenthesis after the test id string,
like "(timeout)" for instance).

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9