This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA] More wrappers in varobj


> Hi,
> 
> I've been trying to update varobj in light of what appears to be either
> bitrot or a bunch of v3 abi issues. We are seeing an extraordinary number
> of problems with C++.

Keith,

have a look at breakpoint.c:gdb_breakpoint for a more robust / current 
way of implementing these wrappers.

In particular:

- it uses catch_exceptions() which has better defined return values.

- the wrapped function has the correct function signature (not char *) 
meaning that the (illegal) function cast is not needed.

- it uses a dedicated struct to pass in the parameter list instead of 
relying on casts and a union.

enjoy,
Andrew


> Index: wrapper.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/wrapper.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.10
> diff -u -p -r1.10 wrapper.h
> --- wrapper.h	2001/03/06 08:21:18	1.10
> +++ wrapper.h	2001/10/15 19:45:21
> @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ extern int gdb_value_subscript (value_pt
> 
>  extern int gdb_value_ind (value_ptr val, value_ptr * rval);
> 
> +extern int gdb_value_struct_elt (value_ptr *argp, value_ptr *args, char *name, int *static_memfuncp, char *err, value_ptr * rval);
> +
>  extern int gdb_parse_and_eval_type (char *, int, struct type **);
> 
>  #endif /* WRAPPER_H */
> Index: wrapper.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/wrapper.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -u -p -r1.12 wrapper.c
> --- wrapper.c	2001/03/27 20:36:24	1.12
> +++ wrapper.c	2001/10/15 19:45:21
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ static int wrap_value_subscript (char *)
> 
>  static int wrap_value_ind (char *opaque_arg);
> 
> +static int wrap_value_struct_elt (char *opaque_arg);
> +
>  static int wrap_parse_and_eval_type (char *);
> 
>  int
> @@ -257,6 +259,47 @@ wrap_value_ind (char *opaque_arg)
> 
>    val = (value_ptr) (args)->args[0].pointer;
>    (args)->result.pointer = value_ind (val);
> +  return 1;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +gdb_value_struct_elt (value_ptr *argp, value_ptr *args, char *name,
> +		      int *static_memfuncp, char *err, value_ptr * rval)
> +{
> +  struct gdb_wrapper_arguments argss;
> +
> +  argss.args[0].pointer = argp;
> +  argss.args[1].pointer = args;
> +  argss.args[2].pointer = name;
> +  argss.args[3].pointer = static_memfuncp;
> +  argss.args[4].pointer = err;
> +
> +  if (!catch_errors ((catch_errors_ftype *) wrap_value_struct_elt, &argss,
> +		     "", RETURN_MASK_ERROR))
> +    {
> +      /* An error occurred */
> +      return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +  *rval = (value_ptr) argss.result.pointer;
> +  return 1;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +wrap_value_struct_elt (char *opaque_arg)
> +{
> +  char *err, *name;
> +  value_ptr *argp, *args;
> +  int *static_memfuncp;
> +  struct gdb_wrapper_arguments *argss = (struct gdb_wrapper_arguments *) opaque_arg;
> +
> +  argp = (value_ptr *) argss->args[0].pointer;
> +  args = (value_ptr *) argss->args[1].pointer;
> +  name = (char *) argss->args[2].pointer; 
> +  static_memfuncp = argss->args[3].pointer;
> +  err  = (char *) argss->args[4].pointer;
> +
> +  (argss)->result.pointer = value_struct_elt (argp, args, name, static_memfuncp, err);
>    return 1;
>  }
> 
> 
> 
> 



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]