This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/c++] Fix printing classes with virtual base classes



These are two independent fixes, right?  I understand GDB may need
them both before it works correctly; I'm asking if each of them is a
correct change in its own right.  If so, could you show me a test case
that each change fixes?

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> 2001-11-26  Daniel Jacobowitz  <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> 	* values.c (value_primitive_field): Add embedded_offset to the
> 	address of structure members.
> 	* gnu-v3-abi.c (gnuv3_rtti_type): Cast to base type before
> 	attempting to access vtable pointer.  Set using_enc_p if we cast.
> 	(gnuv3_virtual_fn_field): Call value_cast with structure rather than
> 	structure pointer.  Cast to base type before attempting to access
> 	vtable pointer.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]