This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Don't use thread_db on corefiles


On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 03:04:07PM -0800, Michael Snyder wrote:
> OK.  I'd like to see that patch when it's ready.
> Do you use only lwp's, or do you use glibc/libpthread threads?
> If you use library threads, are you saving their info in the
> core file, or are you only saving the info for the lwp's?

It's completely thread-package-agnostic.  I dump all LWPs sharing the
same VM, as a fairly reliable marker (I'd use 2.4 threadgroups, but
LinuxThreads doesn't use them...)

So there is enough information there for lin-lwp to parse the threads,
if we stubbed out its attempts to write, I expect.  But since the
current Linux threads model has one thread per process, I can simply
use the corefile.c thread support instead, which I'd rather do.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]