This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Further extend "maint info sections" cmd with ALLOBJ


Pierre Muller wrote:
> 
> At 23:30 20/12/2001 , Michael Snyder a écrit:
> 
> >As a further extension, the "maint info sections" command
> >will now accept an argument "ALLOBJ" to iterate over all
> >known object files (which includes shared libraries.
> >You can now do (for instance):
> >
> >         (gdb) maint info sect .bss ALLOBJ
> >
> >to see info on the .bss sections of all loaded object files.
> 
> Great job!
> 
>   Just a little remark, I would have expected that I get the same output
> for the main executable in
> 
> "maint info sect"
> and
> "maint info sect ALLOBJ"
> but when I tried it out on a freshly compiled GDB,
> the seciond command didn't should
> the .stab and .stabstr sections that were shown for the first command.
> 
> This is intentional?

Hmm!  No.  And I hadn't noticed it, thanks for pointing it out.

What's happening is, to do the ALLOBJ version, I use the 
section table in the objfile struct rather than the section
list in the bfd.  I do that because I want the relocated 
addresses of the shared libraries, not the raw addresses
that are in the bfd section table.  What I did not notice 
is that the .stabs sections are (apparently) omitted from
the objfile section table.  I suppose it's likely that the
dwarf debugging sections are too.

Well, fortunately I did not change the behavior of the 
original form of the command.  I'll mull this over, and
if I can think of a way to bring the new form into 
compliance, I will.  Otherwise we may just have to 
document the short-coming.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]