This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] "Help" command and completion
Michael Snyder wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 18:47:17 -0800
> > > From: Michael Snyder <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > >
> > > Hmmm... currently the help command uses the default completer,
> > > which completes on symbols. That's definitely not right.
> > > Ideally, we want to complete on commands or something, but
> > > substituting the noop complete would definitely be better than
> > > completing on symbols.
> > How is no completion better than completion on symbols?
> Because the symbols in the program being debugged
> can't possibly have anything to do with gdb commands,
> and therefore can't possibly be valid arguments for "help".
> Not even if you're debugging gdb.
OK to commit?