This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa:testsuite} Overhaul sizeof.exp


It sounds like we understand the alternatives and everyone's got opinions
about them.

  [0] Status quo
  [1] FAIL the test
  [2] XFAIL the test
  [3] KFAIL the test

I'm concerned that for each alternative, someone will find a flaw, and
therefore we'll stick with [0] and keep rejecting useful tests.

Fernando and Daniel and Andrew, I'd like to hold your feet to the fire:
Can you please rank these in priority order and indicate how many of the
high priority ones are acceptable.

Also there may very well be a [4] that I haven't heard of or thought of.

My rank is [2] > [1] > [3] > [0].  [2], [1], and [3] are acceptable to me.
[0] is not.

Michael C


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]