This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fix PR gdb/265, 64-bit pointers in Java


Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> This look OK?  Note the comment.

Perfect.

> -  if (type == java_int_type && n > (ULONGEST)0xffffffff)
> -    type = java_long_type;
> +  /* If the type is bigger than a 32-bit signed integer can be, implicitly
> +     promote to long.  Java does not do this, so mark it as builtin_type_uint64
> +     rather than java_long_type.  0x80000000 will become -0x80000000 instead
> +     of 0x80000000L, because we don't know the sign at this point.
> +  */
> +  if (type == java_int_type && n > (ULONGEST)0x80000000)
> +    type = builtin_type_uint64;
-- 
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://www.bothner.com/per/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]