This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] PTRACE_*REGS and x86-64-linux support for gdbserver
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2002 02:08:08 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA] PTRACE_*REGS and x86-64-linux support for gdbserver
- References: <20020227013749.A20342@nevyn.them.org> <3C7C8196.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 01:49:58AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Yes, ok.
> I noticed, in an earlier patch you create a new ``..._linux'' .dat file.
> That addresses the only concern I had - were some of these register
> format files GNU/Linux specific. If they were, you were renaming them.
They weren't; at the time I made them, we had the glorious state of
affairs where none of the Linux targets had unique register mappings.
At least, I still believe that. orig_eax came along later and put the
lie to that... I still feel like there should be a better solution;
but that will require some thinking about the remote protocol, and can
The new register file conveniently snuck in just under the 8.3 ARI
limit, too :)
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer