This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] gdb_realpath causes problems with GVD


> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> 
> 
>> I have a sad news: filename
>> completion does not work in the case you mentionned, but this issue is
>> not related to my change. I tried with an unmodified GDB, and got the
>> same behavior.
> 
> 
> What version of GDB was that, and what debug info format does your 
> compiler use?
> 
> 
>> I also tried without a simple example without any
>> symbolic link, and it did not work either. It only completes if we enter
>> the filename without the directory prefix, with and without my change.
> 
> 
> This certainly works for me, at least in GDB 5.1.1 with stabs and DWARF2 
> debug info.  It doesn't work with COFF debug info, but that's because 
> COFF doesn't record the leading directories, only the basename.

If the auto-configury fails, gdb_realpath() returns xstrdup of the 
original string.  Since 5.1.1 people have been wacking that bit of 
configury and the corresponding function so that it ``works'' (as in 
implements realpath() semantics) on more platforms.  I think it is that 
``wacking'' that has revealed the regression - in 5.1.1 gdb_realpath() 
on your platform probably wasn't doing anything.

Joel's patch makes things slightly better - it stops the basename part 
from being messed up (what happens if there is no path?) - while neither 
helping nor hindering the regression.  It does need a testcase.  Since 
the completer has regressions, xfullpath() can't be indirectly tested 
using that -> need to directly test xfullpath() -> need the white-box 
directory -> stay tuned.

Joel, can you please create a testcase along the lines of 
gdb.base/selftest.exp that tests xfullpath() using gdb.  I'll find a 
directory for you to put it in!

--

This just leaves us with the regression.  The question here is should 
the path expansion be disabled or the problems fixed.

enjoy,
Andrew







Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]