This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak)
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, fnf at redhat dot com,Mark Kettenis <kettenis at kettenis dot dyndns dot org>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 21 Mar 2002 13:00:09 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak)
- References: <np664ilhxg.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><200202272320.g1RNK5e14347@fishpond.ninemoons.com><20020317014816.B1589@nevyn.them.org> <3C98F14B.7040504@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > [This is long. Feel free to skip to the patch at the very end, and
> > stop to take a gander at the testsuite numbers in the middle :)]
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:20:05PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote:
> >
> >> > Fred, could you look into these failures?
> >
> >> Yes, but I would need access to a host system that exhibits
> >> the failures. Given a pointer and access to such a system,
> >> I can try and see what is going on.
> > I've got it. It's almost exactly like the bug I fixed in binutils
> > addr2line a few hours ago. We do not have an N_SLINE at the beginning
> > of the function. Our starting lines for functions have, as a result,
> > always been a little odd...
>
> Jim, would you be able to bump this one up a bit on your things to do
> list? I believe it addresses the regressions MichaelC detected just
> prior to 5.2 being branched and is on the high priority list.
Yes, I've been sort of panicing this week, but I think this might be
valuable to the project I'm currenty panicing about. I'll probably
get to it today.