This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak)
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, fnf at redhat dot com,Mark Kettenis <kettenis at kettenis dot dyndns dot org>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 25 Mar 2002 17:37:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA/stabs] Fix for line table problems (was: Re: [RFC] Gdb line table implementation tweak)
- References: <np664ilhxg.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><200202272320.g1RNK5e14347@fishpond.ninemoons.com><20020317014816.B1589@nevyn.them.org><npwuw5oi9b.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com> <3C9A48F2.9020108@cygnus.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > This looks sound to me. Let's put it in and see what happens.
>
> Was that trunk or branch? I can understand a suck-it-and-see approach
> for the trunk but not for the branch :-/
I have to admit, changes to this area of code have further-reaching
effects than I usually expect. Definitely for the trunk. Perhaps if
someone tracks down the regressions that Daniel noted, we could
include it in the branch, too.