Re: Your patch to list.exp

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 09:12:10PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote:
> > I just saw this on gdb-cvs.  Was it ever on gdb-patches?  I don't recall
> > seeing it at least.
> 
> Yes, here is the URL to the original post:
> 
>   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-01/msg00115.html
> 
> There was also a reply from Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> which
> I got in email but which doesn't appear to be in the gdb-patches
> list:

> 
>   I just came across this myself.  I agree with Michael and Fred that the
>   isnative test is bogus.
> 
>   Kevin

Oh yes, I remember now.  Thanks.

> > Is it actually correct if you have debugging information for _start
> > available?  If we connect and are in a known line, presumably we will list
> > there instead.
> 
> Hmm, don't know.  I do know that I originally found this problem with
> an actual remote target for which the patch is OK.

I just verified that the test fails if you have debugging info for
_start.  In light of that, please consider reverting this (and maybe an
informative comment...).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer