This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] import drow dbxread.c fix to branch


> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:36:06PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> 
>> DanielJ writes:
> 
>> > Only shows on GCC 3.1, eh?  I'll try to look at it later, but I have no
>> > post-3.0 toolchain installed right now.  Actually, I should
>> > investigate, to make sure it isn't a 3.1 regression...
> 
>> 
>> On the next spin, I'll make a special report of regressions for gcc
>> 3.0.4 versus gcc-3_1-branch.  You can already look at "difference by gcc"
>> in the regular report if you want to pick up a hot spot or two.
>> 
>> BTW my test harness now saves the whole test directory, including all
>> the executable files.  In fact I'll just throw some tarball up in my
>> ftp directory in case it might help someone:
>> 
>> ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/for-pr-gdb-381.tar.gz
>> ftp://ftp.shout.net/pub/users/mec/gdb/for-pr-gdb-381-src.tar.gz
> 
> 
> Thanks.  It does help - that was pretty easy, actually :).  I've found
> the bug; mi-cmd-disassemble does not recognize '0' line numbers, and it
> needs to.  I don't know why only 3.1 triggers this.  Probably a
> function padding thing; the end of the previous function seems to share
> a PC with the beginning of the one being listed.  Here's a patch;
> Andrew, how's this look?

For this command, I'm the wrong person to ask.  Elena?

Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]