This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 00:06:31 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- References: <200204240345.g3O3j6615086@duracef.shout.net>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:45:06PM -0500, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Michael Snyder writes:
> > I think the custom is to mark the second type as "[RFA]".
>
> Okay, I'll try that. It feels a little funny because I'm not actually
> asking for approval, I'm asking for a veto (if any). That is, if no
> response comes in, then I commit such a patch.
In that case, I recommend RFC... but basically, if you're just posting
to see if anyone objects, I'd use PATCH: foo and "I'll commit this in a
few days unless someone minds".
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer