This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
To: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 22:57:54 -0400
Subject: Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
References: <200205110023.g4B0NVCF004832@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3CDC6E2F.9020702@cygnus.com> <15580.31869.406085.760707@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3CDDE701.90603@cygnus.com> <15584.11515.164115.822423@napali.hpl.hp.com> <3CE04238.3060102@cygnus.com> <1020513225722.ZM616@localhost.localdomain> <3CE048D8.9080704@cygnus.com> <15584.31162.596782.982190@napali.hpl.hp.com>

>   Andrew> the test:
> 
>   Andrew> 	!FRAME_ID_INNER_THAN(a,b) && !FRAME_INNER_THAN(b,a)
> 
>   Andrew> does not imply
> 
>   Andrew> 	FRAME_ID_SAME(a,b)
> 
>   Andrew> (or what ever the functions are called).
> 
> I'm not sure I'm following you here.  Why is there both
> FRAME_ID_INNER_THAN() and FRAME_INNER_THAN()?
> 

Typo :-(

References:
- new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: Kevin Buettner
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: new gdb arch routine FRAME_UNCHANGED
  - From: David Mosberger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]