This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 1: member data
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:34:26 -0400
- Subject: Re: gdb.c++ testsuite 1: member data
- References: <20020514121358.773176f1.bkoz@redhat.com>
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 12:13:58PM -0700, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
> These four files test for data member display in gdb. The first,
> member_data.cc, tests (bool, int, long, enum) data members and then
> tests various combinations of templates, non-POD object, etc. The data
> members tested are not random, and are synthesized to represent common
> constructs in the C++ standard library.
>
> The second does the same, but the data members are static.
>
> As it stands, member_data.cc passes on linux when compiled shared, fails
> when static. The second file, members_data_static.cc, fails always. (And
> has for years, three at least.)
>
> Please let me know what you think, and feel free to check them in. I'd
> really like it if one day these files both passed, for static and shared
> linkage.
>
> Files as attached. I don't have write access to the 'src' module. (And
> it's not especially imperative that I have it.)
>
> tested x86/linux
>
> 2002-05-14 Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
>
> * gdb.c++/member_data.cc: New file.
> * gdb.c++/member_data.exp: New file.
> * gdb.c++/member_data_static.cc: New file.
> * gdb.c++/member_data_static.exp: New file.
Ben, thanks a lot for submitting these! We can always use more C++
tests, and I'm at work on the ones we have too much already to add
more. I don't suppose the "1" in the subject means you've got more
coming?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer