This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:21:00 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros
- References: <200205151255.NAA15827@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:
|> Further, it's general to talk about 'ISO' when referring to c99. I said
|> 'ANSI', which is usually taken to refer to the original standard.
I'm pretty sure that ANSI has adopted C99 too. And C89 (well, C90
actually) was an ISO standard as well.
|> And anyway, the important point here is that GDB is not being coded to c99.
No sweat.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."