This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] h8300 Change literal reg numbers to REGNUM macros


Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:

|> Further, it's general to talk about 'ISO' when referring to c99.  I said 
|> 'ANSI', which is usually taken to refer to the original standard.

I'm pretty sure that ANSI has adopted C99 too.  And C89 (well, C90
actually) was an ISO standard as well.

|> And anyway, the important point here is that GDB is not being coded to c99.

No sweat.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]