This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH/RFA] builtin-regs buglet
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 17:24:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] builtin-regs buglet
- References: <200205150851.JAA18699@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
>
> You said it...
>
> The size of this, plus some of the attendant changes elsewhere, makes me
> wonder whether we should create a separate branch -- this could be quite
> destabilizing, particularly for some of the target connections that use
> the revised ARM code.
Yes. Could use the regbuf branch or create your own. I can test
against arm-sim and I could do with an extra target to test against.
As for the change, I suspect there are two steps: make everything a
pseudo (probably the bit to have on the branch?); then add lots more to
the raw/pseudo registers.
thoughts?
Andrew