This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH/RFA] builtin-regs buglet
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 15:50:45 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] builtin-regs buglet
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> >
> > You said it...
> >
> > The size of this, plus some of the attendant changes elsewhere, makes me
> > wonder whether we should create a separate branch -- this could be quite
> > destabilizing, particularly for some of the target connections that use
> > the revised ARM code.
>
> Yes. Could use the regbuf branch or create your own. I can test
> against arm-sim and I could do with an extra target to test against.
>
> As for the change, I suspect there are two steps: make everything a
> pseudo (probably the bit to have on the branch?); then add lots more to
> the raw/pseudo registers.
Putting it in the regbuf branch might be best, but it'll need the
REGISTER_SIM_REGNO patch if I'm to get the sim target working.
R.