This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] Add two new OS ABI variants
> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 18:51:45 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
>
> But does it make
> sense to use GDB_OSABI_DJGPP when all function names still use go32
> somewhere in their name? Do you have any plans for renaming those?
I don't mind renaming go32-nat.c into djgpp-nat.c, but renaming a
file in CVS has nasty side effects, and I'm not sure we have a reason
good enough to suffer those side effects.
But a new constant, if we name it DJGPP from day one, has no such
adverse consequences.