This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
PATCH: Obsolete comment in ada-lang.c
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:56:34 -0400
- Subject: PATCH: Obsolete comment in ada-lang.c
A comment in ada-lang.c was complaining about the use of TYPE_ARG_TYPES,
which I smote out of existence last week. Pointed out by Elena; committed
as obvious.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
2002-06-19 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* ada-lang.c (fill_in_ada_prototype): Update comment.
Index: ada-lang.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/ada-lang.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -p -r1.1 ada-lang.c
--- ada-lang.c 4 Jun 2002 15:28:47 -0000 1.1
+++ ada-lang.c 19 Jun 2002 16:52:51 -0000
@@ -4280,15 +4280,7 @@ ada_add_block_symbols (block, name, name
/* Function Types */
/* Assuming that SYM is the symbol for a function, fill in its type
- with prototype information, if it is not already there.
-
- Why is there provision in struct type for BOTH an array of argument
- types (TYPE_ARG_TYPES) and for an array of typed fields, whose
- comment suggests it may also represent argument types? I presume
- this is some attempt to save space. The problem is that argument
- names in Ada are significant. Therefore, for Ada we use the
- (apparently older) TYPE_FIELD_* stuff to store argument types. */
-
+ with prototype information, if it is not already there. */
static void
fill_in_ada_prototype (func)