This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: next gettextization step


>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:

>> Actually, the gmo files aren't in the repository.  They do end up
>> in the source tree though.

Andrew> Sounds like they shouldn't?

Maybe.  It's a toss-up since the files have to be in the distribution.
So on the one hand it is cleaner to put them in the build tree for
developers, but on the other hand it means that the build rules for
them won't ever be tested by maintainers.

I've thought about this some more today.  I'd prefer to move forward
with my original patch.  My reasoning is that similar code has been in
the src tree (in 7 places) for 4 years now, so we've already worked
out the problems with it.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]