This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] block_innermost_frame tweak
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 02 Jul 2002 13:05:37 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA] block_innermost_frame tweak
- References: <20020620131440.M397@gnat.com> <nphejxver5.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><3D126D8A.9020908@cygnus.com> <np7kksv3zm.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><3D138B65.8070401@cygnus.com> <npelf0s1mc.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><3D13AEE9.10209@cygnus.com> <np3cvgqks2.fsf@zwingli.cygnus.com><20020702174116.GP17987@gnat.com>
Joel Brobecker <brobecker@gnat.com> writes:
> > Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> > > Oops, I guess we're back to frame_address_in_block() then?
> >
> > Sure thing.
>
> Sorry for letting this drag for so long. So is the last patch I
> submitted fine if I replace get_frame_calling_pc by
> frame_address_in_block?
The latter is the name we all agreed on, right? I think it's okay,
then.
> I am including the previous changelog just as a "refresher".
No you aren't. :)