This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
The variable is used vis:On Aug 16, 11:37am, Andrew Cagney wrote:This patch renames the ``not_a_breakpoint'' parameter of bpstat_stop_status() to the more correct ``not_a_sw_breakpoint'' so that it is clear that it is indicating nothing about hardware breakpoints.
This may be a good change, but I don't think it's obvious. Could you at least explain the reasoning that lead you to conclude that the parameter in question indicates nothing about hardware breakpoints?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |