Re: [PATCH] Minor reformatting in infrun.c

[Joel Brobecker <brobecker at gnat dot com>]

> > I can commit the following patch. I verified that a later re-indent
> > does not cause a formatting change in the second argument.
> 
> Yes,

I committed this change. 

> and now I can see no reason not to put the arguments back
> the way they were originally.  Or, say. 
> 
>   stop_bpstat =
>     bpstat_stop_status (&stop_pc, 
>                         [...]

Absolutely. But unfortunately this is not the way indent formats it:

<<
          stop_bpstat =
            bpstat_stop_status
            (&stop_pc,
             sw_single_step_trap_p
             || (currently_stepping (ecs)
                 && prev_pc != stop_pc - DECR_PC_AFTER_BREAK
                 && !(step_range_end
                      && INNER_THAN (read_sp (), (step_sp - 16)))));
>>

Should I check-in the indent'ed version anyway? (I would send a separate
[PATCH] message)

-- 
Joel