This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFA: gdb/783 doc change
- From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: ezannoni at redhat dot com
- Cc: jjohnstn at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 20:16:29 +0300
- Subject: Re: RFA: gdb/783 doc change
- References: <3DD03C0D.7A22A286@redhat.com> <15824.19936.296672.828391@localhost.redhat.com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
> From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 19:40:00 -0500
>
> Hmmm, the current documentation specifies that a command is:
>
> mi-command ==>
> [ token ] "-" operation ( " " option )* [ " --" ] ( " " parameter )* nl
>
> I.e. the -- bit is optional. Doesn't this take already care of the PR?
> The PR was filed againt 5.2.1. So the doco was updated in between then
> and now.
>
> Maybe I am misreading the PR, though. You cannot remove '--' from
> the data-disasssemble doco because the command really uses it.
> The generic doco change seems ok.
>
> I'll let Eli comment.
Andrew already responded to this (and I agree with what he said).