This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch/rfc] FRAME_FP() -> get_frame_base()


At 13:46 24/11/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>> 2002-11-19  Andrew Cagney  <ac131313@redhat.com>
>> 
>> 	* frame.h (FRAME_FP): Delete macro.
>> 	(get_frame_base): New function declaration.
>> 	* frame.c (get_frame_base): New function.
>> 	(get_frame_id): Use ->frame.
>> 	(frame_find_by_id): Rewrite to use get_frame_id.
>> 	* blockframe.c: Use get_frame_base instead of FRAME_FP.
>> 	* cris-tdep.c, d10v-tdep.c, findvar.c, h8500-tdep.c: Ditto.
>> 	* hppa-tdep.c, i386-tdep.c, infcmd.c, infrun.c: Ditto.
>> 	* m68hc11-tdep.c, m68k-tdep.c, mcore-tdep.c, mips-tdep.c: Ditto.
>> 	* mn10200-tdep.c, mn10300-tdep.c, rs6000-tdep.c: Ditto.
>> 	* sh-tdep.c, sparc-tdep.c, stack.c, tracepoint.c: Ditto.
>> 	* v850-tdep.c, valops.c, z8k-tdep.c: Ditto.
>> 
>I've checked this in.
Andrew, you forgot varobj.c file
I committed this as obvious fix.

2002-11-24  Pierre Muller  <muller@ics.u-strasbg.fr>

        * varobj.c (find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain):
        Use get_frame_base instead of FRAME_FP,
        obvious fix.

$ cvs diff -u -p varobj.c
Index: varobj.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/varobj.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -p -r1.35 varobj.c
--- varobj.c    24 Nov 2002 14:16:38 -0000      1.35
+++ varobj.c    24 Nov 2002 23:02:22 -0000
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ find_frame_addr_in_frame_chain (CORE_ADD
       frame = get_prev_frame (frame);
       if (frame == NULL)
        return NULL;
-      if (FRAME_FP (frame) == frame_addr)
+      if (get_frame_base (frame) == frame_addr)
        return frame;
     }
 }



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]