This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] port simple gdb.threads/schedlock.c test fix to branch
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 00:24:26 -0500
- Subject: Re: [RFA] port simple gdb.threads/schedlock.c test fix to branch
- References: <200212030519.gB35JOt21685@duracef.shout.net>
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 11:19:24PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > This is OK for the branch. I think I meant to do it at the time and
> > dropped the ball. I should also check that the lin-lwp fix for
> > schedlock.exp made the branch...
>
> >From the black box point of view, gdb HEAD and gdb 5.3 branch are
> behaving very differently with schedlock.exp. This is with all the
> same compilers and binutils and yada. gdb HEAD gives me 2 FAILs
> consistently, and gdb 5.3 branch gives me 8 FAILs most of the time
> and 4 FAILs some of the time.
>
> Gory details below.
>
> My version is from 2002-11-25, a week ago, and you checked in one
> fix to lin-lwp.c since then, to call linux_proc_xfer_memory.
> Is that the fix that lin-lwp.c needs?
No. It should be, um...
2002-10-31 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* lin-lwp.c (lin_lwp_resume): Remove resume_all test for !step.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer