This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: PING [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 18:40:08 -0500
- Subject: Re: PING [RFA] DWARF-2, static data members
- References: <ro1ptt1kq5z.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU><15855.46570.409897.896793@localhost.redhat.com><ro1fztc2ilq.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
David Carlton writes:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2002 15:24:10 -0500, Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com> said:
>
> > Makes sense. Hoever, could you leave the comments inside the 'then' bodies?
> > Like
> > if (blah)
> > {
> > /* C++ static member. */
> > [...]
> > }
>
> Will do.
>
> > I think it would be useful to add a g++ version number or a date in
> > the comments, because at some point down the road we may want to
> > obsolete the old form.
>
> Right, I'll add that.
>
> > Was the patch to gcc submitted, or the gcc PR fixed otherwise?
>
> No, I can't submit the patch to GCC until a version of GDB including
> this patch is released, because otherwise they'll emit debugging info
> that we can't handle.
>
I know, but I figured that, given their 'freeze' cycles, it could
get reviewed in the meantime.
Speaking of which, I've heard rumours that the Dberlin patch for
namespace debug info has been reviewed... Indeed it has:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-11/msg00978.html
Elena
> I'll commit it with the changes to the comments that you requested.
>
> David Carlton
> carlton@math.stanford.edu