This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Added verbosity to dwarf2*
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: Michal Ludvig <mludvig at suse dot cz>
- Cc: GDB Patches <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 08:05:23 +0200 (IST)
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Added verbosity to dwarf2*
On Sat, 14 Dec 2002, Michal Ludvig wrote:
> - error ("dwarf cfi error: unsupported target address length.");
> + error ("dwarf cfi error: unsupported target address length [%s]",
> + bfd_get_filename (abfd));
Wouldn't it be better to say "[in module %s]"? I'm afraid a BFD file
name alone won't explain enough to the user. After all, not everyone who
uses GDB knows all the module names in their program by heart.