Re: Recent MI patches broke the testsuite

["J. Johnston" <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 01:24:28PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
> > J. Johnston writes:
> > > My bad.  :(  The new mi-basics.exp testcase is my usual sanity test
> > > for this change.  It was updated and in fact works fine as it is expecting
> > > the new behavior.
> > > 
> > > I did not look at the correct gdb.log for the full mi testsuite.
> > > As you have noted, the lib/mi-support.exp routine mi_reinitialize_dir
> > > is using -environment-directory and is expecting the old output.
> > > 
> > > I have a patch for lib/mi=support.exp to handle the new syntax which I have
> > > included.  Since I require approval for patches I will revert the
> > > original patch and resubmit with the added change unless Elena says
> > > otherwise.
> > > 
> > If this patch fixes the testsuite, no need to revert the other one,
> > just check this in. Don't forget the ChangeLog.
> >
> > Maybe Daniel can verify that it fixes his problem?
>
> Yes, it does, except for the mi-basics.exp part.  And that's minor.
Great.  I have checked in the patch from the previous note.  I will
look into making the mi-basics.exp test more robust with regards
to relative paths without overly abusing .*.

-- Jeff J.