This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb/849: no break line when stop at member function of a class
- From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:39:58 -0500
- Subject: Re: gdb/849: no break line when stop at member function of a class
- References: <20030113220031.20551.qmail@sources.redhat.com><15907.15090.800418.896270@localhost.redhat.com><20030113221622.GA27681@nevyn.them.org><15907.15902.260249.612759@localhost.redhat.com><20030113222949.GA28462@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:30:54PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 05:17:22PM -0500, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> > > > drow@sources.redhat.com writes:
> > > > > Synopsis: no break line when stop at member function of a class
> > > > >
> > > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->drow
> > > > > Responsible-Changed-By: drow
> > > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jan 13 14:00:29 2003
> > > > > Responsible-Changed-Why:
> > > > > Got it.
> > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > > > > State-Changed-By: drow
> > > > > State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 13 14:00:29 2003
> > > > > State-Changed-Why:
> > > > > Fixed by:
> > > > > 2003-01-13 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > * symtab.c (find_pc_sect_line): Don't consider end-of-function
> > > > > lines.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=849
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > where was the original patch to gdb-patches?
> > >
> > > It went to gdb@ instead, in the discussion; I forwarded it to
> > > gdb-patches when I checked it in. Sorry.
> > >
> >
> > Do you have an url? I just don't remember seeing it.
>
> I just sent it to gdb-patches before checking it in, that was:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-01/msg00496.html
>
> It was buried in the end of a long discussion; I should probably have
> resent it to gdb-patches under a different subject. Sorry about that.
> The patch was in:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-01/msg00113.html
>
> Dan
You should know what the procedure for patches is. A new thread
with a pertinent subject on the correct mailing list.