This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: PATCH : H8300 Simulator File I/O Implementation


Hi All,

Just as a reminder, are the changes done to the H8300 
simulator OK, is there something else that needs to be 
done. There hasn't been any activity after the final set 
of changes.

If OK, could someone apply the patches to newlib and the 
simulator.

Regards,

Venky



> -----Original Message-----
> From: D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 10:33 AM
> To: Kazu Hirata; gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com;
> newlib@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: RE: PATCH : H8300 Simulator File I/O Implementation
> 
> 
> Hi Kazu, 
> > 
> > Hi Venky,
> > 
> > > ;int open(const char *pathname, int flags);
> > > ;Integer arguments have to be zero extended.
> > > ;The second argument is taken from the stack,
> > > ;hence it is not zero extended here.
> > 
> > By the second argument, do you mean flags?  If so, it is in 
> regster r1
> > or er1 in all variants of H8, I think.
> 
> I meant the flags, but as this function uses variable 
> arguments, I found the
> 
> flags on the starting position on the stack and R2. As the calling
> convention 
> for variable arguments seems to be different, I get the 
> parameter from the 
> stack. If there is some improvement that can be done, I would 
> be willing to 
> do the same heartily. :-)
> 
> > 
> > Kazu Hirata
> > 
> 
> Thanks and Regards,
> 
> Venky
> 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]