Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:25:43 -0500
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
>
> Ahm, what does this mean, exactly, "read_fp in the machine description"?
> Isn't read_fp a function? If so, how can it be present ``in the machine
> description''?
regcache.c contains:
CORE_ADDR
read_fp (void)
{
return TARGET_READ_FP ();
}
and TARGET_READ_FP() is part of the machine description (a.k.a.
architecture vector).
Yes, but still I find it confusing to tell that a function is in the
machine description. A machine description is a bunch of macros and
machine-specific functions, right? And read_fp is neither of these,
right?
Hmm, I guess this could do with a similar s/FP_REGNUM/read_fp/
transformation?
Probably.