This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, drow at mvista dot com, mec at shout dot net
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:08:51 +0200 (IST)
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Just FYI, the dwarf v3 spec contains one `DWARF 2' and no `DWARF2's.
I don't really care how do we spell DWARF 2, as long as we do that
consistently and as long as future support of DWARF 3 will spell DWARF 3
the same way.
Perhaps also look at GCC docs and see if they spell it differently; I'd
prefer to be consistent with them as well.