This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, drow at mvista dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:15:08 +0200 (IST)
- Subject: Re: [rfa/doc] correct info about best C++ compilers/debug formats
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> I tested it, too: I built gdb and 'makeinfo' worked fine.
As long as we are testing, perhaps someone could find a moment and TeX
the manual, to see that the additions typeset well.
Also, did you try to follow the external references, like this one:
See @ref{Debugging Options,,Options
for Debugging Your Program or @sc{gnu} CC, gcc.info, Using @sc{gnu} CC},
for more information.
In my experience, references to other manuals tend to confuse people, and
thus have a somewhat higher probability of being written incorrectly. I
cannot say I see anything wrong with this one, but I don't pretend to
remember the order of the arguments by heart ;-)